Re: Getting published in *Wired*

JP May (jpm@TWEB.COM)
Sun, 17 Dec 1995 07:28:42 -0600

Arthur,
Having not had a chance yet to peruse either, and based on your first hand
experience, do you thin kthey hacked your piece really just for prosaic
reasons of fitting around the art directors layout idea etc, or, do you
think the editor took your piece as raw material and essentially presented
HER political (or whatever) ideas, sort of moulding your work to be how she
wanted it ....... ??

jp

> If you get a chance to take a peek at my mini-piece on "overlinking" in
>the "Idees Fortes" section of the latest (winter, 1996) issue of *Wired*,
>take a trip over to http://charon.sfsu.edu/overlinked.html. The online
>essay is of course much closer to my original intent -- exactly
>equivalent to it, in fact, since I put it on the site myself. To see the
>reduced, condensed and boiled down version in *Wired* next to what I
>originally sent in is to see vividly how editorial decisions can and do
>shape the final form of your ideas in the conventional media publishing
>process.
> Mind you, I'm not complaining about what a cruel editor did to my
>deathless prose. They paid me, and editors have (or feel that have) to
>reshape their "copy" into a format commensurate with their assigned space
>in the magazine. My main point is not to complain about the editorial
>process, but to celebrate the fact that, even though the published piece
>emerged much altered in the editorial compression chamber, I can now
>offer my original vision on the www for all (who care) to see.
>
>-- Arthur Chandler

____________________________________
OT 1.0.8 + FreePPP 1.0.2 = happiness (relatively speaking)